Supreme Court won’t hear Springfield’s case to let them ban panhandling

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Cash in pocket from ThinkStock

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has turned down an appeal from Springfield, Illinois, officials seeking to reinstate an ordinance that banned panhandling in the city’s downtown historic district.

The justices on Monday let stand an appeals court ruling that said the city’s ban was unconstitutional.

The ordinance defined panhandling as a verbal request for the immediate donation of money. A federal appeals court ruled last year that the ban infringed on free speech rights.

The city argued that the anti-panhandling ordinance was meant to regulate the behavior of panhandlers but not their message.

The case is City of Springfield v. Don Norton, 15-727.


Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.