No contract deal in Sherrard, but both sides say they’ve made compromises

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

After months of negotiations, the Sherrard School Board and Sherrard Education Association have not made an agreement on a contract.

The two sides met Wednesday, January 29, 2014 for several hours, but left the negotiation session without an agreement.

“We’re not anywhere near a deal,” said Robert Wilson, the lead negotiator for the Sherrard Education Assocation.

“We’ve really come to the middle on every issue, it really has to come from them,” he added.

School Board President Leslie Anderson said in a phone interview Thursday, January 30, 2014, that the two sides have agreed on 17 different issues and that the Board has also come to the middle.

“It takes two parties to negotiate at this point,” said Anderson.

Wilson says there are several small issues, but the big one has to deal with the contract length. The Sherrard Education Association wants a three year contract, while the Sherrard School Board wants a one year contract.

The School Board listed four reasons for why they wanted a one year contract in a memo. The reasons include plans to implement a universal start time for all schools in the Sherrard district.

In addition to keeping current employees to help with the transportation of students, the district would need to have additional help. According to a memo sent January 29, 2013, the Board is prohibited from hiring an outside party for duties already performed by employees during the term of a collective bargaining agreement.

Wilson says the Sherrard Education Association is concerned with how having outside help would impact current employees hours, wages, and retirement.

While there are several disagreements, both sides agree that the ongoing negotiations are not benefiting the kids.

“Students are being impacted. Teachers are being distracted,” said Anderson.

“It's not what's best for students, it's not what's best for teachers and the community is even behind us, it's not what's best for them,” said Wilson.

Some parents also agree.

“I just feel that it hurts everybody in the process because the teachers are worried about whether they're going have a job tomorrow to come to so their main focus isn't on the kids like it should be. That makes it tough for all of them,” said Jason Moon.

Anderson says the School Board will meet to discuss the transportation situation on February 6, 2014.

The Sherrard Education Association will meet with the union on February 9, 2014 to discuss whether or not they will vote on their intent to strike.


  • Amy Hunt

    I did not take part in this poll, because it does not present realistic choices. How can a school function without a joint alliance between teachers and students or teachers and parents? They are equally important. The relationship a teacher has with his or her students is a bond that cannot be made a statistic. I know this is a difficult concept to grasp if you haven’t spent time in a classroom. It is not an easy job, but it is the best, most important job a person can have outside of being a parent.

  • mandi harms

    I pray that the hearts of the board members will be softened. As a teacher I just want what’s best for my kids. My working environment is there learning environment.

Comments are closed.